Most investors obsess over stock picks.
But the pros?
They obsess over allocation and rotation.
If those words sound like CNBC jargon, don’t worry. This article will break them down, explain why they matter more than individual trades, and walk you through how to apply them to your own portfolio using a macro-aware, behaviorally smart approach.
Rotation and Allocation—What Do They Mean?
Let’s start simple:
Rotation = where capital is moving (in and out of sectors or asset classes).
Allocation = how your portfolio is divided up across those sectors or asset classes.
So why does this matter?
Because chasing hot stocks without understanding why they’re hot—or when they’ll cool off—is gambling, not investing.
Understanding rotation helps you:
Spot early macro trends before they go mainstream.
Anticipate which sectors are likely to outperform (or underperform) next.
Avoid holding yesterday’s winners while everyone else is moving on.
Understanding allocation helps you:
Manage risk through diversification.
Maximize returns by tilting toward favorable macro conditions.
Stay grounded with a system—rather than reacting emotionally to headlines.
What’s “The Great Rotation” Everyone Talks About?
In financial media, you’ll often hear about “The Great Rotation”—usually in reference to investors shifting out of one major asset class into another.
Examples:
From growth to value stocks
From U.S. equities to emerging markets
From bonds to commodities
From tech to energy
From risk-on to risk-off
These shifts don’t happen at random. They follow macro cycles—driven by interest rates, inflation expectations, global demand, fiscal/monetary policy, and investor sentiment.
If you want to stay ahead of the market, you need to track the why behind the rotation—not just the headlines about what is rotating.
Allocation: The Holy Grail of Diversification
Diversification isn’t just a checkbox. It’s your portfolio’s airbag when markets crash—and its engine when the right sectors take off.
But diversification doesn’t mean buying everything and hoping something goes up.
It means allocating intentionally based on macro trends, risk tolerance, and personal goals.
Ask yourself:
What stage of the economic cycle are we in?
Which asset classes tend to do well in that stage?
How much downside am I willing to tolerate in pursuit of upside?
What Assets Deserve a Place in Your Portfolio?
Your portfolio isn’t a popularity contest—it’s a war room.
Here’s how I think about asset classes in 2025:
My Allocation Strategy YTD (And Why It Changed)
At the start of 2025, I was chasing performance and complexity:
50% in gold, silver, and mining stocks
25% in energy stocks
20% in commodities
5% in leveraged inverse ETFs tied to NASDAQ
The logic was to hedge event risk in stocks, play energy strength, and ride a possible breakout in precious metals.
Long-term Elliott Wave Principles drove the signals. It’s hard to follow, and detecting the wave formation is too hard for most investors.
Here’s what I learned:
Leveraged inverse ETFs are too volatile unless you actively trade them. I made money—but lost sleep.
Silver is more industrial than I accounted for. Tariffs, not just inflation, moved it.
Individual stocks are hard to own unless you understand the business deeply. I couldn’t keep up.
I don’t understand commodities, such as oil, gas, and agriculture. Uranium ought to be a good trade to piggyback nuclear, but so much is tied into long-term contracts that the spot price did not behave as I expected
So I rebalanced.
I changed frameworks to simplify.
The target allocation for the categories is:
S&P 500 - 60%
Precious Metals (replacing bonds) 30%
Bitcoin 10%
Those default percentages are based on historical performance and backtesting relative to a traditional 60/40 portfolio. The 40 bonds is replaced with precious metals and bitcoin.
The macro environment—encompassing growth, inflation, and deflation—determines whether it’s a risk-on or risk-off environment. If it’s risk-on, the allocation is 100% of the target; if it’s risk-off, the allocation is 50%.
There is a bottom-up adjustment based on volatility and momentum signals that can further adjust that allocation by 50% or down to zero.
If any of the categories is adjusted to zero, then the allocation for that category is moved into cash.
Now my allocation looks like this:
30% Gold & Miners (I still believe in monetary debasement risk)
60% S&P 500
10% Bitcoin
10% Cash/Short-term T-bills (for safety and liquidity)
(I know: that adds up to 110%, but I think of the cash in absolute terms, and the allocation is about investable assets.)
You can see how those categories have changed systematically year-to-date. (We discuss the system in more detail inside the community.)
I’ve simplified. I sleep better. And my decisions are now grounded in macro conviction, not “gut trades.”
People Love Their ‘Longs’ But You Shouldn’t Fall in Love
Let me be blunt: you are not your positions.
When you “fall in love” with a stock or sector, you stop being objective. You ignore new data. You defend it like it’s your child.
That’s how people held ARKK from $130 to $35. Or Tesla from $400 to $150. Or gold from $2,100 to $1,800.
One of the best skills you can develop as an investor is non-attachment.
Hold opinions loosely. Hold allocations with discipline. Fall in love with your system, not your stocks.
How Often Should You Rebalance?
Ah, the million-dollar question.
Some say monthly. Others say quarterly. Some wait for major macro events.
Here’s what I do:
I review my allocation weekly using a simple dashboard.
I rebalance when allocations drift by 5–10%, or when macro signals shift.
I log every trade and rate my emotional confidence in it (1–10).
I never act based on price alone. I act based on signals and process.
There’s no perfect frequency. But here’s the rule:
Don’t rebalance emotionally. Rebalance intentionally.
Three Simple Things You Can Do Today
Want to move from reactive to intentional investing? Start here:
1. Write Your Allocation Rules
Create your own “Investor Operating Manual.”
Include:
Asset classes you want exposure to
Minimum and maximum % allocation for each
Your triggers for rebalancing
A “do not trade list” (mine includes levered ETFs!)
2. Track Portfolio Rotations
Once a month, answer this:
What’s rising?
What’s falling?
Why?
This helps you see patterns before they become consensus.
3. Talk to Smart People Who Disagree With You
Echo chambers feel nice.
But uncomfortable conversations lead to better decisions.
Join communities (like Fearless Investor) where your ideas get sharpened—not just validated.
Final Thought: Smart Isn’t Enough. Disciplined Is Better.
The biggest myth in investing is that intelligence leads to success.
It doesn’t.
Success belongs to those who:
Build a system.
Follow the data.
Control their emotions.
Rotate and allocate with purpose.
You don’t have to predict the future.
You just need to prepare for it better than the crowd.
📊 Want help building your portfolio strategy based on macro fundamentals?
→ Book a call with Dakota Ridge Capital
🧠 Want to be around disciplined investors learning together?