MacroMashup— Annual 2025 Macro Brief
What 2025 clarified — and what investors must carry forward into 2026
Welcome to MacroMashup—your weekly briefing on the real forces driving markets beneath the headlines. If you want disciplined macro analysis, portfolio frameworks, and real-world capital insights, subscribe to receive every deep dive.
2025 was the year the macro narrative stopped being theoretical and started reshaping portfolios.
Energy constraints became investment realities. AI’s infrastructure demands materialized. Geopolitical fragmentation stopped being a tail risk and became a structural feature. And the Federal Reserve’s familiar playbook proved far less effective than many expected.
But the most important development of 2025 wasn’t a single call or market move.
It was a shift in how markets respond.
Markets became less responsive to forecasts, guidance, and clean narratives — and more responsive to capacity, constraints, and balance-sheet realities. Investors who adjusted their mental models early felt calmer by year-end. Those who didn’t often felt increasingly reactive, even as information became more abundant.
This Annual Macro Brief is not a prediction for 2026.
It’s a reset.
It lays out what 2025 clarified, which assumptions quietly expired, and how investors should approach the year ahead with stronger orientation, better decision discipline, and fewer narrative-driven mistakes.
Why 2025 Was a Clarifying Year (Not a Volatile One)
Many investors will remember 2025 as noisy.
Rates moved. Markets chopped. Narratives rotated quickly. At times, it felt like nothing stuck long enough to trust.
That interpretation misses the point.
2025 wasn’t defined by instability. It was defined by disillusionment — the quiet removal of assumptions investors had been carrying forward from the prior decade.
Markets didn’t behave irrationally. They behaved selectively.
Some signals stopped working.
Some reassurance stopped landing.
Some explanations stopped producing follow-through.
What felt confusing was actually a sorting process.
Markets were clarifying what still matters, what matters less, and what no longer works at all.
What 2025 Made Clear (That Markets Now Price)
The most important lesson of 2025 wasn’t about growth or inflation levels.
It was about responsiveness.
Markets became less responsive to:
Policy signaling
Forward guidance
Consensus optimism
Clean narratives
And more responsive to:
Capacity
Constraints
Balance-sheet realities
Physical and political limits
This explains why “good news” often failed to extend rallies — and why “bad news” sometimes barely moved prices.
Three clarifications stood out.
First, inflation behavior mattered more than inflation prints.
Markets stopped reacting to month-to-month fluctuations and focused instead on persistence, stickiness, and second-order effects.
Second, policy intent mattered less than policy capacity.
What central banks wanted to do mattered less than what they could do without triggering unintended consequences.
Third, liquidity mattered more than narratives.
When liquidity tightened, markets became less forgiving regardless of the story attached to it.
Assets closer to the edge of the ‘circulatory system’—Bitcoin—suffered most.
None of this happened suddenly. Markets priced it quietly.
What 2025 Quietly Removed From the Investor Playbook
Some assumptions didn’t weaken in 2025. They expired.
One was the belief that liquidity backstops are automatic. Intervention now comes with trade-offs, delays, and political constraints.
Another was the idea that diversification always reduces risk. Correlations rose when it mattered most, and complexity often hid fragility rather than reducing it.
Perhaps most importantly, 2025 challenged the belief that waiting for clarity is a viable strategy. By the time clarity arrived, markets had often already moved.
These removals created discomfort — because they didn’t come with immediate replacements.
But those gaps also created opportunity for investors willing to update their frameworks.
The Five Dominant Macro Themes of 2025
1. The AI Energy Imperative: Power Became the Bottleneck
AI’s computational demands turned energy infrastructure into critical investment terrain. The winners weren’t just software companies — they were those controlling power generation, transmission, and reliability.
2025 takeaway: Energy stocks outperformed tech late in the year. Companies solving AI’s power problem gained pricing power.
2026 implication: The AI trade is now an energy trade.
2. The Death of the “Work” Metric
Traditional labor statistics broke down. Work continued. Productivity surged. Jobs disappeared from official measures.
Markets stopped reacting to employment prints and focused instead on margins, productivity, and automation.
2026 implication: Watch productivity, profit margins, and capex — not headline employment data.
3. The Commodity Reset
Commodities stopped acting like cyclical hedges and started behaving like structural growth assets.
Gold and silver reflected monetary debasement and central bank diversification. Copper, uranium, and critical minerals became national security issues.
2026 implication: Commodities belong in portfolios as growth positions, not just protection.
4. Geopolitical Fragmentation Accelerated
The post–Cold War order continued to unwind. Globalization gave way to regionalization. Supply-chain sovereignty became policy priority.
2026 implication: Favor regional resilience over global efficiency.
5. The K-Shaped Reality Deepened
Asset owners continued to win. Labor lagged. Scarce assets outperformed. Broad averages masked widening dispersion.
2026 implication: Quality, scarcity, and conviction matter more than broad exposure.
A Shift in How We Think About 2026
Before laying out actions, it’s worth addressing something directly.
The biggest upgrade heading into 2026 isn’t a new theme — it’s a new level of rigor in decision-making.
2025 reminded us of a simple truth: good outcomes don’t always mean good decisions, and bad outcomes don’t always mean bad ones.
That distinction matters.
Inspired by the principles outlined in Thinking in Bets (Annie Dukes), MacroMashup is placing greater emphasis on:
Decision quality over outcome chasing
Explicit recognition of uncertainty
Bias awareness and probabilistic thinking
Reviewing calls with discipline, not ego
The goal isn’t to sound more cautious. It’s to be more accountable.
That shift — toward clearer frameworks, stress-tested assumptions, and shared learning — is the foundation of what’s coming in 2026.
The Constraints That Define 2026
Entering 2026, markets are anchored to constraints that move slowly and matter deeply:
Energy capacity remains a physical reality
Debt and fiscal flexibility limit policy choices
Labor and demographics cap growth potential
Geopolitical fragmentation increases friction
The cost of capital is no longer negligible
These aren’t forecasts. They’re boundaries.
Markets don’t debate them. They work around them.
2026 Action Plan: Five Moves for the Year Ahead
1. Build Energy Infrastructure Exposure
Natural gas midstream, nuclear, grid modernization, and AI-adjacent power infrastructure.
Why: AI’s energy demands are non-negotiable.
How: ~15–20% of growth allocation.
2. Increase Commodity Exposure Structurally
Gold, copper, uranium, and critical materials.
Why: Structural demand meets constrained supply.
How: Favor physical exposure and quality producers.
3. Focus on AI’s Second-Order Beneficiaries
Not Nvidia — but the companies serving Nvidia’s customers.
Why: Second-order effects are less crowded.
How: Automation, infrastructure, and productivity enablers.
4. Embrace the K-Shaped Reality
Scarce assets over broad exposure.
Why: Dispersion persists.
How: Concentration in highest-conviction positions.
5. Prepare for Shocks — Don’t Trade Them
Volatility will rise. Structural trends remain.
Why: Headlines exaggerate noise.
How: Maintain dry powder. Execute the plan.
What to Stop Doing in 2026
Stop trading Fed announcements
Stop chasing “cheap” value without structural support
Stop diversifying for comfort rather than resilience
Stop waiting for “normal” to return
Volatility is the baseline.
Macro Mashup: Deep-Dive Insights, Weekly
Macro Mashup is where we go deeper, every week.
It’s a weekly deep dive into the forces shaping markets right now — macroeconomics, energy, geopolitics, capital flows, and policy — with an emphasis on what actually matters versus what simply dominates headlines.
Subscribers receive:
Weekly deep-dive analysis
Clear frameworks to interpret current events
Context that helps you avoid narrative-driven decisions
If you want to start the year oriented instead of reactive, this is the best place to begin.
Already Reading Macro Mashup? Explore Fearless Investor
If you’re already subscribed to Macro Mashup, our sister publication, Fearless Investor, takes a complementary approach.
Fearless Investor focuses on:
Portfolio strategy and allocation
Behavioral finance and decision-making
Practical systems and tools for DIY investors
It’s less about what’s happening out there — and more about how to structure decisions and portfolios in response.
Many readers follow both because together they cover:
Macro context (Macro Mashup)
Investor behavior, strategy, and systems (Fearless Investor)
If you haven’t explored Fearless Investor yet, it’s worth a look.
Continue reading here →
https://open.substack.com/pub/fearlessinvestor
Final Thought
2025 clarified something essential:
The old rules didn’t break overnight — they stopped compounding.
Energy determines AI winners.
Commodities determine energy winners.
Geopolitics determines access.
Automation determines survival.
The through-line is scarcity.
Your 2026 portfolio shouldn’t answer what you think will happen next.
It should answer what becomes more valuable as the world fragments, electrifies, and automates.
That’s where durable returns come from.